functional anti jam3 antibodies (Bio-Rad)
Bio-Rad is a verified supplier 
93
Structured Review
Bio-Rad
functional anti jam3 antibodies
Functional Anti Jam3 Antibodies, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/functional anti jam3 antibodies/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 10 article reviews
Functional Anti Jam3 Antibodies, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/functional anti jam3 antibodies/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 10 article reviews
functional anti jam3 antibodies - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "JAM3 maintains leukemia-initiating cell self-renewal through LRP5/AKT/ β -catenin/CCND1 signaling"
Article Title: JAM3 maintains leukemia-initiating cell self-renewal through LRP5/AKT/ β -catenin/CCND1 signaling
Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation
doi: 10.1172/JCI93198
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) mRNA levels of JAM3 in total BM cells, CMP, GMP, MPP, ST-HSCs, LT-HSCs, YFP+ leukemia cells, YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs, and L-GMP cells was measured by quantitative RT-PCR (n = 3). (B–D) MLL-AF9+ leukemia cells were evaluated for LIC frequencies and c-Kit expression levels (MFI) in JAM3+ and JAM3– cells (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (E) Representative flow cytometric analysis of leukemia cells in the peripheral blood of recipient mice receiving transplants of WT or Jam3-null MLL-AF9+ BM cells upon the first to third transplantation. (F) Quantification data in E (n = 4–5; ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). PB, peripheral blood. (G–I) Survival data for recipient mice (lethally irradiated) receiving WT or Jam3-null MLL-AF9+ BM cells upon the first (G), second (H), and third transplantation (I) (n = 4–5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, log-rank test). (J) Survival data for recipient mice (sublethally irradiated) receiving WT or Jam3-null leukemia cells upon the second transplantation (n = 5; ***P < 0.001, log-rank test). (K) Representative images of Giemsa-Wright staining for WT and Jam3-null MLL-AF9+ BM cells upon the second transplantation. (L) Quantification of the frequencies of blast cells in K (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (M) Representative images of the sizes of spleens and livers of recipient mice upon the second transplantation. (N and O) Quantification of the weight of spleens and livers in M (n = 4; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (P) Histological H&E staining of livers and spleens. (Q) Limiting dilution assays comparing the frequencies of LICs in WT and Jam3-null MLL-AF9+ BM cells. Experiments were conducted 3–5 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transplantation Assay, Irradiation, Wright Stain, Staining, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative flow cytometric analysis for WT and Jam3-null L-GMP cells of the recipients upon the secondary transplantation. (B) Quantification of frequencies of L-GMP cells in A (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (C and D) Survival data for recipient mice receiving WT or Jam3-null L-GMP cells upon the second to third transplantation (n = 5; **P < 0.01, log-rank test). (E–G) Representative images of colony formation of WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs of the secondary recipients in the first plating (E). The colony numbers (F) and total cell numbers of colonies in E (G) were counted (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (H–J) Representative images of colony formation of WT and Jam3-null leukemia cells clonogenically derived from the first plating (H). The colony numbers (I) and total cell numbers of colonies in H (J) were calculated (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (K) Cell cycle status was determined in WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs of the secondary recipients. (L) Quantitative analysis of the cell cycle distribution in K (n = 4–6; ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). (M) CFSE-labeled WT and Jam3-null leukemia cells of secondary recipients were transplanted and analyzed for the homed CFSE+ cells in the recipients’ BM and spleen (n = 5–6). (N) WT and Jam3-null leukemia cells of secondary recipients were transplanted into the recipient mice by intratibial injection, followed by the examination of leukemia cells 2 weeks later (n = 5; ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (O) Representative flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis of WT or Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs. (P) Quantification of data in O (n = 4). Experiments were conducted 3–5 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Transplantation Assay, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Injection, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A and B) GO (biological process) and KEGG (pathway) analyses of the microarray data of WT or Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs. Candidate changes are highlighted in red. (C) Potential candidates related to self-renewal, cell cycle, and Wnt signaling were examined in WT and Jam3-null LICs by quantitative RT-PCR (n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test). (D) CCND1 levels were compared between WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs by immunoblotting. (E) Ccnd1 was ectopically expressed in Jam3-null leukemia cells and injected into recipient mice. Survival was compared among the mice receiving WT cells, Jam3-null cells, and Ccnd1-overexpressing WT or Jam3-null cells (n = 5–6; ***P < 0.001, log-rank test). (F) CCND1 levels were validated in leukemia cells from the rescue experiment in E. (G) The cell cycle distribution in YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs from the rescue experiment in E was determined using Ki-67 and Hoechst 33342 staining (n = 3–5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). Experiments were conducted 3–5 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Microarray, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Injection, Staining, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Phospho–β-catenin (S552) and total β-catenin levels were evaluated between WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs by immunoblotting. (B) β-Catenin levels were compared between WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs by immunofluorescence staining. Scale bars: 5 µm. (C) A constitutively active form of phospho–β-catenin (S37A, β-cateninCN) was subcloned in the pCDH-EF1a-T2A-mCherry vector and ectopically expressed in Jam3-null leukemia cells, which were then injected into recipient mice. Survival was compared among the mice receiving WT cells, Jam3-null cells, and β-cateninCN–overexpressing WT or Jam3-null cells (n = 5–6; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, log-rank test). (D) Phospho–β-catenin (S552) and total β-catenin levels were validated in leukemia cells from the rescue experiment in C. (E) The cell cycle distribution in YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs from the rescue experiment in C was determined using Ki-67 and Hoechst 33342 staining (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). (F) StrepII-tagged JAM3 and FLAG-tagged LRP5 were overexpressed in 293T cells, and their lysates were coimmunoprecipitated by strepII beads, followed by Western blotting analysis for FLAG (LRP5). (G) A reverse coimmunoprecipitation experiment was performed after LRP5-FLAG pull-down, followed by Western blotting analysis for strepII (JAM3). The empty vector was used as the control. Experiments were conducted 3 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Plasmid Preparation, Injection, Control, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Protein levels of phospho-PDK1 (S241), PDK1, phospho-AKT (T308), AKT, phospho-GSK3β (S9), and GSK3β were measured in WT and Jam3-null YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs by immunoblotting. (B) V5-tagged PDK1 and FLAG-tagged LRP5 were overexpressed in 293T cells, and their lysates were coimmunoprecipitated by V5 antibodies and protein A/G beads, followed by Western blotting analysis for FLAG (LRP5). (C) A reverse coimmunoprecipitation experiment was performed after LRP5-FLAG pull-down, followed by Western blotting analysis for PDK1 (V5). (D) A constitutively active form of phospho-AKT (E17K, AKTCN) was subcloned into pCDH-EF1a-T2A-mCherry vector and ectopically expressed in Jam3-null leukemia cells, followed by injection into recipient mice. Survival was compared among the mice receiving WT cells, Jam3-null cells, and AKTCN-overexpressing WT or Jam3-null cells (n = 5–7; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, log-rank test). (E) Phospho-AKT (T308) and AKT levels were validated in leukemia cells from the rescue experiment in D. (F) The cell cycle distribution in YFP+Mac-1+c-Kit+ LICs from the rescue experiment in D was determined using Ki-67 and Hoechst 33342 staining (n = 3; ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). The empty vector was used as the control. Experiments were conducted 3 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation, Injection, Staining, Control, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative flow cytometric analysis of JAM3 expression on different leukemia cell lines including Kasumi-1 (M2), HL-60 (M3), THP-1 (M5), U937 (M5), and MV4-11 (M5). (Isotype control, gray line). (B) FLAG-tagged JAM3 and shRNAs targeting JAM3 (sh997, sh1188, sh359, and sh731) were cotransfected into 293T cells (1:4 ratio), followed by immunoblotting for JAM3. (C) Representative images of JAM3-knockdown (sh731 and sh1188) THP-1 cells after 6 days in culture. (D–G) The numbers of THP-1, U937, Kasumi-1, and HL-60 cells were counted at the indicated days after infection with the JAM3-targeting sh731 or sh1188 or scrambled shRNA (n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). (H) Representative images of colonies formed by the JAM3-knockdown (sh731 and sh1188) THP-1 cells after 9 days of culture in 1640 medium supplemented with 0.9% of methylcellulose and 10% of FBS. (I) Quantification of colony numbers in H (n = 3; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). (J) Representative flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle distribution in THP-1 cells targeted by sh731, sh1188, or scrambled shRNA, which was determined using BrdU incorporation. (K) Quantitative analysis of the cell cycle distribution results in J (n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). Experiments were conducted 3–5 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Western Blot, Knockdown, Infection, shRNA, BrdU Incorporation Assay, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative flow cytometric analysis of JAM3 expression on the immunophenotypic Lin–CD34+CD38–CD90–CD45RA+ LICs (LMPP cells) and CD34–CD38– differentiated human AML cells (AML#7 in Supplemental Table 2). (B) Quantification of the MFIs for JAM3 expression on LMPP cells or CD34–CD38– differentiated leukemia cells in A (AML#2, #5, #6, #8 in Supplemental Table 2; n = 5; *P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (C) Quantification of the relative frequency of JAM3+ cells in LMPP or CD34–CD38– differentiated leukemia cells in A (n = 5; *P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (D–H) Cell numbers of 5 patient AML samples were counted at the indicated days after knockdown of JAM3 by sh1188 or scrambled shRNA (AML#1–AML#5 in Supplemental Table 2; n = 3; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-test). Experiments were conducted 3–5 times for validation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Knockdown, shRNA, Biomarker Discovery